Build intelligent autonomous agents powered by state-of-the-art language models. Leverage OpenAI GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini to create reasoning agents that understand context and execute complex workflows.
We help you select the optimal LLM based on latency requirements, cost constraints, and specialized reasoning needs.
| Features | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | $3.00 | $1.25 |
| Context window | 128k | 200k | 1M+ |
| Reasoning depth | Extreme | High | Balanced |
| Function calling | |||
| Best for | General purpose / Reasoning | Coding / Logical consistency | Large doc analysis / Video |
Autonomous agents aren’t just text generators; they interact with the world through tools. We implement secure function calling protocols that allow LLMs to invoke your internal APIs, query databases, and trigger webhooks.
Automatic selection of the right tool based on user intent and semantic similarity.
Validation layers that prevent hallucinated tool calls and unauthorized data access.
{ "name": "get_customer_data", "description": "Fetch ERP data for specific ID", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": { "customer_id": { "type": "string", "description": "UUID of the account" } } } }
Effective agents require state persistence. We architect multi-tier memory systems that balance context window constraints with historical knowledge.
Session-based conversation history using sliding window token management.
Vector-based semantic retrieval (RAG) for persisting business knowledge across sessions.
Scratchpad space for complex reasoning steps and intermediate tool results.
Knowledge graphs storing structured relationships between users, products, and facts.
Real-time visibility into your agent’s reasoning, tool use accuracy, and token spend.
From technical automation to strategic analysis, our agents are built to deliver measurable value.
Autonomous web browsing, document summarization, and data extraction for market analysis.
Automated PR reviews, unit test generation, and legacy code documentation using specialized LLMs.
Executing SQL queries, generating executive summaries, and identifying trends in complex datasets.
Defining agent objectives, tool requirements, and selecting the optimal foundation models.
Building memory systems, defining tool schemas, and optimizing few-shot prompting strategies.
Connecting to production APIs, building RAG pipelines, and implementing safety guardrails.
Evaluation loops, performance monitoring, and model fine-tuning for production readiness.
Pricing depends on token volume, model selection (GPT-4 vs Haiku), and custom integration complexity. Let’s build a budget that scales with your growth.
It depends on your priority. If reasoning is key, GPT-4o is superior. For high-speed creative output or low-cost coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is often the winner.
Yes. We build using model-agnostic orchestration layers like LangChain, allowing you to swap LLM providers with minimal disruption.
We use a combination of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), strict schema validation, and reflection loops where the agent double-checks its own work.
WhatsApp us